Sunday, October 25, 2015

Why is Judicial System Required to be Revamped Early?

स्वस्थ न्याय प्रणाली का होना सामाजिक उन्नति के लिए उतना ही आवश्यक है जितना कि शरीर के रखरखाव के लिए उचित भोज्य सामग्री। लोकतंत्र में देश की जनता का विश्वास बनाये रखने के लिए यह अनिवार्य है कि संपूर्ण न्याय प्रक्रिया में शीघ्रता ही नहीं वरन् पारदर्शिता भी जरुरी है और पारदर्शिता बनाये रखने के लिए न्याय-अधिकारियों का चयन भी पारदर्शी होना चाहिए। आपसी जवाबदेही और जिम्मेदारी को न्यायपालिका ने समय-समय पर बखूबी निभाया है। इसकी निष्ठा संदेह से परे है लेकिन अगर कभी उसकी मंशा और पारदर्शिता पर सवाल खड़े होते हैं तो उसे दूर करने की जिम्मेदारी भी न्यायपालिका की ही है। यह देश की 125 करोड़ आबादी की आस्था और भरोसे का केन्द्र है, इसलिए न्यायपालिका में नियुक्तियों के मसले को न्यायपालिका का आंतरिक मामला बता देना पारदर्शिता से मुंह मोड़ना है।
 
माननीय उच्चतम न्यायालय ने राष्ट्रीय न्यायिक आयोग अधिनियम को असंवैधानिक घोषित कर ​िदया है जिसमें न्याय-अधिकारियों के चयन मे पारदर्शिता परिलक्षित न होने के कारण पिछले साल संसद ने जजों द्वारा जजों की नियुक्ति करने वाली कोलेजियम प्रणाली की जगह न्यायिक नियुक्ति आयोग (एनजेएसी) पारित किया गया था। अधिनियम की मंशा यह थी कि न्यायपालिका में नियुक्ति प्रणाली को और पारदर्शी किया जाये। लिहाजा सरकार और समाज को भी इस नियुक्ति प्रक्रिया में शामिल करते हुए न्यायिक नियुक्ति आयोग का प्रावधान किया गया। कार्यपालिका के इस कदम को न्यायपालिका ने अपनी स्वतंत्रता और संप्रभुता पर अतिक्रमण मानते हुए हाल ही में एनजेएसी अधिनियम अंसवैधानिक करार ​िदया है और जजों द्वारा ही जजों की नियुक्ति वाली कॉलेजियम प्रणाली के फिर से लागू होते ही नियुक्तियों में पारदर्शिता का प्रश्न फिर खड़ा हो गया है।
 
यहां यह उल्लेखनीय है कि खुद न्यायपालिका को भी कॉलेजियम प्रणाली के पुख्ता होने पर पूरा भरोसा नहीं ​ है। इसकी खामियों का कहीं न कहीं न्यायपालिका को भी आभास है। न्यायपालिका के इतिहास में यह पहली बार हुआ है और इसीलिए इसने अपनी इस कमी को दूर करने के लिए कार्यपालिका से सुझाव मांगे हैं। इस के तहत आगामी 3 नवम्बर को कॉलेजियम प्रणाली को संशोधित करने के लिए सरकार अपने सुझाव प्रस्तुत करेगी। 

देश का हर नागरिक जानता है कि सिर्फ स्वतंत्र और सक्षम न्यायिक व्यवस्था ही समाज में भरोसा कायम कर सकती है। और  स्वतंत्र और सक्षम न्यायिक व्यवस्था एक न्यायपालिका तब ही सुनिश्चित कर सकती है जब वह स्वयं पारदर्शी हो। पारदर्शिता के लिए न्यायपालिका को न्यायधीशों की नियुक्ति प्रणाली में कार्यपालिका और समाज की सहभागिता को अतिक्रमण न मानकर खुले ​िदल से स्वीकार करना चाहिए। ट्रांसपेरेंसी इंटरनेशनल इंडिया के वैश्विक भ्रष्टाचार सूचकांक 2013 के अनुसार भारत में 45 प्रतिशत राय देने वालों की नज़र में भारतीय न्यायपालिका भ्रष्ट है।
 
मौजूदा कॉलेजियम प्रणाली में सबसे बड़ा दोष है कि यह गोपनीयता के अंधेरे में काम करती है। ऐसे देश में पारदर्शिता के लिए जहां न्यायपालिका स्वयं सक्रिय हो वहां न्यायधीशों की नियुक्ति में पारदर्शिता के स्थान पर गोपनीयता बनाये रखने के लिए आग्रही होना समझ से परे ही नहीं लगता बल्कि संशय पैदा करता है।
 
हमारे देश में न्यायपालिका को बहुत बड़ी जिम्मेदारी दी गयी है। भारतीय न्यायपालिका जनअधिकारों की पहरेदार बनाया गया है। इसलिए जनहित के खिलाफ जनप्रतिनिधियों के बनाए किसी भी कानून पर वह अविलम्ब लगाए रोक लगाने में भी सक्षम है। न्याय की आस लगाये देश के आम नागरिक को जब अन्य स्थानों से दुत्कार ​िदया जाता है तो न्याय हेतु वह अदालत की ओर ही रुख करता है। जनहित के पहरेदार के रुप में कार्य करने वाले न्यायाधीशों को न्यायपालिका के सीमित दायरे में ही बंधे रह कर कार्य करना न्याय की निश्पक्षता के लिए अनुचित प्रतीत होता है।
 
1993 में उच्चतम न्यायालय ने न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति और स्थानानंरण का अधिकार यह मानते हुए अपने हाथ में ले लिया था कि न्यायाधीश न्यायिक परिवार के सदस्य होते हैं। ऐसा हो जाने के बावजूद न तो न्यायपालिका में भ्रष्टाचार कम हुआ और न ही न्यायिक प्रक्रिया में शीघ्र निस्तारण के प्रति कोई ललक ही उत्पन्न हुयी। अब देश इस स्थिति को और ज्यादा देर तक मानने के लिए उत्सुक नहीं है। इसलिए कॉलेजियम प्रणाली में पारदर्शिता लानी होगी। अमरीका में न्यायाधीश नामित करने के साथ ही उसका नाम प्रकाशित कर ​िदया जाता है और सीनेट की न्यायिक समिति देश के हर आम और खास व्यक्ति से उस व्यक्ति के बारे में जानकारी एवं राय मांगती है और तय समय पर विचार करके उसकी नियुक्ति पर अंतिम फैसला करती है।
 
माननीय उच्चतम न्यायालय ने यह विशेष तौर पर उल्लिखित किया है कि न्यायपालिका की स्वतंत्रता भारतीय संविधान के बुनियादी ढांचे में निहित है। लेकिन क्या यह स्वतंत्रता न्यायधीशों की नियुक्ति की रहस्यमयी प्रणाली  तक ही सीमित है? कॉलेजियम प्रणाली मेंन्यायधीशों की नियुक्ति के लिए कोई भी नियमावली घोषित नहीं की गयी है तो न्यायिक नियुक्ति आयोग (एनजेएसी) के गठन से स्वतंत्रता कैसे भंग हो जाती! यह प्रयास तो स्वछंदता को नियमित करने के लिए था जो न्यायपालिका को स्वीकार नहीं है और इस प्रकार न्यायपालिका का अपने पर जनमत का भरोसा कम करने का प्रयास है। संविधान के अनुच्छेद 124 (2) में यह स्पष्ट किया गया है कि जजों की नियुक्ति य​िद राष्ट्रपति जरुरी समझे ंतो उच्चतम न्यायालय के जजों और राज्यों के हाईकोर्ट के जजों की सलाह पर की जायेगी। संविधान में कहीं भी कॉलेजियम प्रणाली का जिक्र नहीं किया गया है। कॉलेजियम का गठन उच्चतम न्यायालय ने क्या अपने हितों का को साधने के लिए संविधान की व्यवस्थाओं से इतर नहीं किया गया?
 
कॉलेजियम प्रणाली में सुधारों के लिये सबसे बड़ी चुनौती यह होगी कि यह न्यायधीशों की जवाबदेही कैसे स्थापित हो। न्यायधीशों की छोटी-मोटी गल्तियों का कोई संज्ञान ही नहीं लिया जाता और न ही दंडित किया जाता है। दूसरी तरफ, महाभियोग की प्रक्रिया इतनी जटिल है कि अभी तक किसी न्यायाधीश पर संभव ही नहीं हो पाया है। य​िद कोई आवाज उठाने की कोशिश करता है उस पर अवमानना का ईस्तेमाल किया जाता है। आम आदमी इस बात से हतप्रभ है कि जिस अपराध के आरोप पर एक सामान्य व्यक्ति को जेल में एक लम्बे अर्से के लिए रहना पड़ जाता है उसे जमानत भी आसानी से नहीं मिलती है, उसी तरह के मामले में न्यायमूर्ति सौमित्रसेन जैसे लोग केवल इस्तीफा देकर कैसे बरी हो जाते हैं। किसी न्यायाधीश को सजा क्यों नहीं हो पाती?
 
स्वस्थ भारत के लिए न्यायपालिका को अपने सुधार के लिए आत्मचिंतन करना होगा और कार्यपालिका के साथ आमजन को उसके द्वार पर शीघ्र न्याय प्रदान करने के लिए पूर्ण पारदर्शिता के साथ कार्य करना होगा, देश के विभिन्न स्थानों पर हाईकोर्टस् एवं सुप्रीम कोर्ट की बैन्चस् की स्थापना करनी होगी अन्यथा संभावित अराजकता के लिए न्यायपालिका ही मुख्य जिम्मेदार ही मानी जायेगी।  (इस लेख के मुख्यांश दैनिक जागरण से उदृत हैं।)



Thursday, October 22, 2015

Love Your Job, You Will Get Success.

Love your job or love what you do. We must love our job like children love any job they undertake. When they play, they play with all the love at their command. Whatever we may do, if we do the same with love, we will get success definitely. We need to work hard and if we fix up our goals before embarking upon any task, success is bound to follow. Goals are our dreams with deadlines. If you choose a goal and stick to that, that would change everything and you will achieve the success you dream for. If you want to reach a distant goal, you must take small steps instead of sitting idle.
We all understand well that focus and determination play significant roles in success. If we look at any top athlete or businessman, painter, politician, any successful individual – a movie star, musician or any other celebrity, we will find that they succeed because they focus on their task, they love their job, they love what they do. For our success, we need to identify our goals and then let nothing distract us from achieving it. Any distraction can lead to dissipate our energy and attention.
Here, we must ignore “Luck” factor in our psychological manoeuvrability while working for our goals fixed. What is luck? It is only as relevant or irrelevant as we make it. Whenever a gamble plans to gamble, he swears by the same. But we are not gambler. We need to achieve our task, the task defined by our goals. Luck is nothing but a convenient excuse, an alibi or a crutch for those who fail or who do not love to work sincerely but await for the results without putting in the hard labour the task warrants for. What we make of our life is entirely in our own hands. Luck is what happens to others. It is just a consolation for the losers.
It is true that you can not win all the time. Somebody in your opposition may have put in better efforts. We can learn from our failures and try to do better next time. If we compete fairly, it shall be our greatest challenge and we need to accept it even if somebody criticises our efforts/steps. Criticism must be considered as a part and parcel of our success. We need to live with it and learn about our wrongs. It is also true that an average human being does not accept criticism of any kind very easily. We need to work above what an average human being does. We must take seriously every criticism and examine the same just to improve ourselves. Dealing with criticism in a mature way makes one a stronger person.
Appreciation is the oxygen that nurtures the creative instinct. You must apply it with your team members as and when required but we must not take it as narcotic for ourselves as if we do not get appreciation, we may get nervous. Instead, we must remain attuned to our work and in course of time, we too will get appreciation. It is possible only when we love our job.


Wednesday, October 21, 2015

Communalism be eliminated for true Secularism



In 1947 Hindustan was divided on two nations for two religions theory by the outgoing Britishers into two parts. India and Pakistan emerged – the former adopted Secularism whereas the latter adopted Islam as its official religion.

What do we mean when we use the term “Religion” and  “Secularism”?

Religion
After the advent of civilization, the human beings started to live in some groups. To facilitate smooth living, some code of conduct based on some beliefs and experiences came into form and that code of conduct became religion in due course of time. We can thus say that a religion is an organized collection of beliefs, cultural systems, and world views that relate humanity to an order of existence. As the number of the groups increased, the number of religions also grew up as per the geographical circumstances in which  the individual groups lived.
Many religions have narratives, symbols, and sacred histories that aim to explain the meaning of life, the origin of life, or the Universe. From their beliefs about the cosmos and human nature, people may derive morality, ethics, religious laws, or a preferred lifestyle. The development of various religions has taken different forms in different cultures. Some religions place an emphasis on belief, while others emphasize practice. Some religions focus on the subjective experience of the religious individual, while others consider the activities of the religious community to be most important. Some religions claim to be universal, believing their laws  to be binding for everyone, while others are intended to be practiced only by a closely defined or localized group. In many places religion has been associated with public institutions such as education, hospitals, the family, government, and political hierarchies.
Curiosity, acceptance, family, honour, idealism, independence, order, physical activity, power, romance, saving, social contact, status, tranquility, eating and vengeance  etc. are some factors which appeal to the man towards approaching to some religion. Professor Reiss said: 'It doesn't matter whether God exists or not as religious belief is aimed at fulfilling our basic human desires. New theory claims religions are an attempt to satisfy basic human desires. Psychologists say that it helps to explain the many contradictions in religion. Atheists also tend to be people seeking to fulfil a desire for independence
The five largest religious groups by world population, were estimated in the  year 2010 to account for 5.8 billion people and 84% of the population, are Christianity sharing 32%, Islam 23%, Hinduism 15%  Buddhism 7% and folk religion to the extent of 6%.
In India, the most dominant religion today is Hinduism. About 79% of Indians are Hindus. Around 500 BC two other religions developed in India, namely, Buddhism and Jainism. Today only about 0.5% of Indians are Jains and about 0.7% are Buddhist. One comparatively new religion in India is Sikhism and it was established in the 15th century. About 2% of Indians are Sikhs. Along with the religions that developed in India, there are followers of non- Indian religions. The largest non-Indian religion is Islam. They are about 17% of India's population. Christians are more then 2% of India's population. There are also Zoroastrians who even though make less then 0.01% of India's population, are known around India. There are also a few thousand Jews in India. Judaism and Christianity might have arrived in India before they arrived in Europe.
Secularism                                                                                                                               
Secularism what we understand generally is the principle of the separation of the state and government institutions from the religions being practised by the citizens, religious institutions and religious dignitaries. Secularism is asserting the right to be free from religious rule and teachings, or, in a state declared to be neutral on matters of religion, from the imposition by government of religion or religious practices upon its people. Another manifestation of secularism is the view that public activities and decisions, especially political ones, should remain uninfluenced by religious beliefs and/or practices being followed by one or more groups.
The purposes and arguments in support of secularism vary widely. It is a movement toward modernization, and away from traditional religious values. This type of secularism, on a social or philosophical level, has often occurred while giving subsidy to the persons going on Haj, granting financial assistance to the Madarsa or controlling the shrines/temples through government machinery. Some argue that state secularism has served to a greater extent to protect religion and the religious from governmental interference, while secularism on a social level is less prevalent. 
Maharaja Ranjeet Singh of the Sikh empire of the first half 19th century successfully established a secular rule in the Punjab. This secular rule allowed members of all races and religions to be respected and to participate without discrimination in Ranjeet Singh darbar and he had Sikh, a Muslim and a Hindu representatives heading the darbar. Ranjit Singh also extensively funded education, religion, and arts of various different religions and languages.
Now,  we understand that a secular State prefers a society which
  1. Is not homogeneous, but is pluralistic.
  2. Is tolerant. It widens the sphere of private decision-making.
  3. ensures deep respect for individuals and the small groups of which they are a part, equality of all people breaking down of the barriers of class and caste.
  4. While every society must have some common aims, which implies there must be agreed on methods of problem-solving, and a common framework of law; in a secular society these are as limited as possible.
  5. Each person should be helped to realize their particular excellence.
Secularism is a code of duty pertaining to our life, founded on considerations purely human and intended mainly for those who find theology indefinite or inadequate, unreliable or unbelievable. Its essential principles are three: (1) The improvement of this life by material means. (2) That science is the available Providence of man. (3) That it is good to do good. Whether there be other good or not, the good of the present life is good, and it is good to seek that good.
Secularism is so important to the social life of today that a Republican lawmaker in Tennessee has proposed a bill that would ban public schools from teaching "religious doctrine" earlier than 10th grade after parents complained that middle school world history lessons on Islam were inappropriate.
The bill by state Rep. Sheila Butt (R-Columbia) would delay teaching of "religious doctrine," as determined by the state board of education, until grades 10, 11 and 12. “I think that probably the teaching that is going on right now in seventh, eighth grade is not age-appropriate,” Butt told the Tennessean. Tennessee middle school students currently read from religious texts and learn about world religions, including the Five Pillars of Islam. Butt's legislation doesn't specifically mention Islam, but said students aren't ready to learn about religion before a certain age. “They are not able to discern a lot of times whether it's indoctrination or whether they’re learning about what a religion teaches,” Butt said. Parents had made similar complaints, saying the curriculum focused more on Islam than on other religions and bordered on "indoctrination."Other Tennessee lawmakers also have weighed in with concerns about supposed religious indoctrination in schools -- at least when the curriculum involves Islam.
Immediate after partition, India adopted secularism as the basic of its governance and later on it was adopted in the Constitution too. But unfortunately, the political leaders did not honour the spirits of secularism strictly and gradually, opposition of Hinduism and appeasement of the minorities started to take place. Even in the democratic set-up, some communities were preferred on the ground of reservation for scheduled caste, scheduled tribes, backward classes, other backward classes and minorities. In the process of appeasement, the merits had been ignored and corruption took place at the large scale with the nepotism. The other organs of democracy have been jeopardised and at one time, state emergency was declared in name of protecting democracy. In this process, development for better environment in education, infrastructure for better life, employment opportunities and medical facilities was largely overlooked. The principle of Divide and Rule adopted by the Britishers was taken up by the political leaders of modern India by provoking the various communities on linguistic/religious grounds. Many provinces have been split as such. Secularism has been misconstrued to appease some communities while ignoring the basic needs of the majority.  The successive governments in the State and Centre followed the same policy obliging their friends in different walks of life by providing good positions in the government organizations and/or honours, exceeding the tolerance limit of the majority.
In 2014, there was a change in the formation of the government at Centre and the voters supported BJP who was so far considered as the party of the major constituent of  Indian Society, ie, Hindus although Mr.Narendra Modi had started the campaign with the slogan of “Sabka Vikas Sabkey Sath (Development of All with All at par)”.
The tremendous success and support given to him could not meet good taste of those who lost the chairs, resulting into the fact that the opposition is trying its tooth and nail to disrupt his working  through all the means they could adopt. Puzzled with his growing popularity, the opposition leaders have raised a spate of many controversial issues so that the nation be put to public unrest. On the ground of increasing public unrest, some writers declared to return the honours which they were given by the previous governments as if they were in support of the nefarious activities of the opposition leaders/politics. 
While we can sympathize with them for feeling suffocated in the prevailing intellectual atmosphere generated. But it is also true that these writers have not so far been able to create literature which was required for ensuring a secular India. These writers have no match with  Sarat Chandra, Premchand, Subramania Bharati and Faiz of India or  Dickens, Bernard Shaw,  Victor Hugo, Maxim Gorki, Balzac, Maupassant, Walt Whitman, Mark Twain, John Steinbeck, Upton Sinclair, Erich Maria Remarque, and Pablo Neruda. They do write mainly to make money, and have no genuine social commitment. They have become largely commercialized, like the rest of society.
As we understand that the literature is the back-bone for any country to reflect its conscience,  there are broadly two theories of art and literature. The first is called art for art's sake, and the second is called art for social purpose. Those who belong to the first school believe that the purpose of art and literature is only to create a work of beauty for pleasure, or for entertainment. If art is created for a social purpose, it ceases to be art and becomes propaganda. Followers of this school are Keats in English literature, Alexander Dumas in French, Edgar Allan Poe in American, Agyeya and the chayavadi poets in Hindi, and Tagore in Bengali literature. On the other hand those who belong to the school of art for social purpose believe that art should help society, by attacking oppressive institutions, customs and ideas, and by inspiring people to fight against them and secure a better life. In a poor country like India only the second school is acceptable. Art and literature in India should attack inhuman and outdated feudal and backward practises like the caste system, and inspire people to fight for better lives as Sarat Chandra, Kazi Nazrul Islam, Subramania Bharati, Faiz etc did. 
Unfortunately our writers have not done so. All they care for is making money. History shows that for centuries Hindu has been suffering atrocities inflicted upon by the aggressors of other communities. Tolerance has a limit. How far can it be endured? Why not other communities behave like Hindus?
That difference then does it make whether our writers retain their awards or return them?
Now, what we need to be done about for eliminating communalism in the society can be enumerated as below:
1.      We may inspire inter-caste/religion marriages with incentives. Those who undertake inter-caste/religion marriages must be preferred in Government Services.
2.      We may introduce family planning for all the citizens at par.. We may allow each couple to have only two children with a gap of 3 years without any gender preference. In case any child expires in infancy stage, the couple may adopt one child from the recognized orphanage. Those who abide by this condition must be given incentives.
3.      In case any couple procreates more than two children, that couple must be deprived of all the incentives.
4.      Uniform marriage and succession laws be adopted for all the citizens at par without consideration under any particular religion or traditions of the communities.
5.      There be one national language to be adopted by all the States and the Centre including Judiciary and other organs. If anyone needs the translation of a document in his/her native language, that must be provided on nominal cost.
6.      Every candidate aspiring to be elected to any law making body like Gram Panchayat, Nagar Palika, Town Area, Nagar Nigam/Municipal Board, State Assembly, Legislative Council and Parliament  etc. must have minimum education qualification with minimum and maximum age. These candidates must  have no previous conviction by any court of law, no special privileges, no secret foreign bank accounts with the highest integrity, not to indulge in empty talk about helping the poor but instead amass fortunes for themselves or their families.
7.      Similarly, every voter must have minimum education qualification with minimum and maximum age. We must have political leaders who are genuinely patriotic and who work for the welfare of the people.
8.      We must set up a 4 year or 5 year national scientific plan for reconstructing the economy, raising the standard of living of the masses and reducing the imports of those articles which can be produced within the country. This must of course be done with the help of top level scientists, engineers and managers. The plan will include setting up thousands of industries, high standard educational institutions, technical institutes and healthcare centres free of cost for the masses all over India.
9.      We must reform our education system to make it employment oriented. Once we are able to employ our citizens appropriately, they would not be able to think over their communal interests.
10.  We must have a re-look upon the working of our judiciary and the laws to provide smooth and speedy adjudication upon the disputes and crimes.
11.   We should fix the prices of most commodities, and then steadily reduce their prices, say by 5-10% every 2 years or so. In this way a common man will be able to steadily buy more goods with the same wage because prices are falling, and so his real wage is going up ( wages are relative to the price index ). In this way the market will keep steadily expanding, and simultaneously industrial and agricultural production can be stepped up, and the increased goods produced will be absorbed in the indigenous market, instead of there being overproduction and a glut.
12.  All religious temples, mosques, churches, shrines and other set-ups be managed with the government interference so that no communal hatred be permitted to flow out and no funds be misappropriated in other than communities’ development.
13.  We must launch a powerful cultural drive to combat present feudal and backward ideas and practices such as casteism, communalism and superstitions, to spread scientific and rational ideas to every nook and corner of the country as at present most of our people are steeped in casteism, communalism and superstitions which they have inherited over the centuries. To change their minds and habits of thinking is an enormous task.
14.  33% seats must be reserved for females in all the statutory bodies and for their grooming up to enable them to work independently in functioning, special drive be carried  out.
15.  We must withdraw all the public offs granted on the religious grounds. Only national days like Independence Day and Republic Day be declared as public off days.
16.  No political leader/official/officer who holds some office in administration must take part in any religious activity organized by any community for any reason/ground.
17.  There must be no official function involving any religious act for inauguration or laying any stone etc.
The above suggestions can be broad general ideas and can not be said to be perfect.  They be considered if someone likes to attempt upon.





Sunday, August 16, 2015

Be Happy - Start Up India Stand Up India.



For some time, the hope for smooth living was not in sight. It appeared that in every wing of administration, government as well as in judiciary and media, everywhere there would not be any solace unless we had some good amount of money in pocket to bribe or spend lavishly, even to get what we rightfully deserved.  Not only on borders, law and order had depreciated within the lanes of the city and villages and our families were always worried if we could come back to home safely and for those who were out of homes for work were equally worried about the safety of their families. There were incidents where the whole family had been looted and/or beaten horribly. The conditions have not changed so much but there is some improvement in sight now. We hope that they would improve further because some awareness towards collective responsibility is coming up.
Still we need to do a lot. Yesterday, after greeting the nation on its 69th Independence day, the hon’ble Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi  touched many points of interest and inspiration for the Indians. The highlights of his speech can be mentioned below:
I salute our brave freedom fighters today.
This is the Team that makes the nation and takes our nation to new heights
Be it casteism or communalism, there is no place for them. In no way can they be tolerated
Jan Bhagidari' is the biggest asset of our democracy. "Be it MyGov, letters from citizens, Mann Ki Baat, communication with people...daily Jan Bhagidari is increasing", the PM said.
The poor want to move away from poverty and that is why, all our programmes must be for the poor- PM Modi
Bank accounts are essential for integrating poor into the financial system, 17 crore people opened accounts under Jan Dhan Yojna.
All our programmes and institutions should be helpful to the poor; have to empower them through financial inclusion.
Last time from the Red Fort I spoke about toilets and cleanliness. People wondered what kind of PM is he, talking about these issues.
If there is something that has touched every person, it is the movement towards cleanliness.
Almost 4.25 lakh toilets were built in 2.62 lakh schools nationwide in one year; this gives self-confidence that we can do what we want.
Who has given maximum strength to Swachh Bharat Abhiyaan? It is the children of India.
We have been very successful in our campaign to make toilets, especially for girls in schools across India.
We introduced Shrameva Jayate Yojana. It is an effort to change the way we look at the workers of India.
 Dignity of labour has to be our national duty, it has to be a part of our nature.
 India can be free of corruption but we need lots of measures. We have to start from top.
 Some people like to remain in 'Nirasha'. And they are not satisfied till they have spoken about it to other people.
20 lakh Indians have given up LPG subsidy
Coal block auction has been undertaken by the govt, national exchequer will get Rs 3 lakh crore.
 On the issue of black money, we took a lot of steps within such a short time. We formed a SIT under the SC's guidance the day we took over.
Some people are worried about tough law on black money. It has ensured that nobody dares to take black money out of the country.
 PM makes disclosure that Rs 6500 crores disclosed under compliance window of black money and foreign assets law.
CBI has registered 1800 corruption cases after we formed government.
India cannot develop till the eastern part of India develops.
India will progress if Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, West Bengal, Odisha and the north east develop.
Even after so many decades of Independence there are 18,500 villages in India which do not have electricity.
We affirm our commitment to provide electricity to all those villages that do not have electricity.
 Agriculture ministry to be renamed as ministry of agriculture and farmer welfare for institutionalised care of the farmers.This is not just a change in nomenclature of the ministry. This means farmers issues would get prime importance in the ministry's scheme of things.
A new vertical has been created to look after farmers' welfare and to help those farmers who are in distress.
Start up India' and 'Stand up India', PM exerts in his speech.
As part of the Skill India and Digital India initiative, the Prime Minister said a package of incentives will be given to manufacturing units for generating jobs.
Our government has agreed to One Rank One Pension in principle, talks are in last stages.
The Prime Minister reiterated his government's resolve to make India a developed nation by 2022, with a house and access to basic services like electricity, to all. He said the government had resolved to connect with electricity, all the 18,500 villages which still remain without power, within the next 1000 days. He also reiterated his vision for the development of eastern India.
Questioning the practice of interviews for recruitment even at relatively junior levels, the Prime Minister called upon concerned departments to end this practice at the earliest, and to promote merit by recruiting only through transparent, online processes.
He announced a new campaign 'Start-up India; Stand up India' to promote bank financing for start-ups and offer incentives to boost entrepreneurship and job creation. From the Red Fort, he added that each of the 1.25 lakh bank branches should encourage at least one Dalit or Adivasi entrepreneur and at least one woman entrepreneur. He also promised to do away with the current practice of interview-based selections for low-skilled government jobs. More significantly, the Prime Minister announced the 'Start-Up India' initiative, to encourage entrepreneurship among the youth of India. "We are looking at systems for enabling start-ups. We must be number one in start-ups... Start-up India; Stand up India," he said, exhorting all bank branches to fund at least one start-up of tribals and dalits. The initiative, Shri Modi said, would give a new dimension to entrepreneurship and help in setting up a network of start-ups in the country.
As part of the Skill India and Digital India initiative, the Prime Minister said a package of incentives will be given to manufacturing units for generating jobs. Shri Modi also questioned the practice of "interviews" for recruitments even at relatively junior levels and asked departments concerned to end this practice at the earliest and promote merit by recruiting only through transparent, online processes. The Prime Minister reiterated his government's resolve to make India a developed nation by 2022, with a house and access to basic services like electricity to all. Talking about the financial inclusive programme Jan Dhan, he said 17 crore bank accounts were opened. Although these were to be zero-balance accounts, people deposited a whopping Rs 20,000 crore in them, reflecting the "richness of India's poor", he added. The Prime Minister also spoke of the welfare schemes launched by the his government, including Atal Pension Yojana, Pradhan Mantri Suraksha Yojana, Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Yojana, and the schemes launched for labour welfare. He said 10 crore people have enrolled for social security schemes in a mere 100 days. He added that the government has resolved to provide electricity to all the 18,500 villages which still remain without power within the next 1,000 days. He also reiterated his vision for the development of eastern India.
Here some of the announcements made by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Saturday during his Independence Day address:
-18,500 villages which still remain without power to be provided electricity in the next 1,000 days.
- Government to club 44 labour laws into four codes to simplify them for the people.
- Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana launched with an outlay of Rs. 50,000 crore.
- Ministry of Agriculture would be renamed as the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers' Welfare.
- A "Start-Up India" initiative to encourage entrepreneurship among the youth.
- One-Rank, One-Pension accepted "in-principle". Modalities being worked out with stakeholders.
- Boost to financial inclusion with 17 crore bank accounts opened through the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana.
- Scheme for direct transfer of LPG subsidy has resulted in savings of Rs. 15,000 crore.
- Corruption cases probed by CBI have gone up from 800 before NDA government assumed office to 1800 now.
- Each of 1.25 lakh bank branches should encourage at least one Dalit or adivasi entrepreneur and at least one woman entrepreneur.

If we go through the inspiring speech of the Prime Minister on the eve of Independence Day, we feel that he has been able to arouse inspiration in the common man towards the governance. But keeping in view the performance of the bureaucracy for last 68 years, we may not be able to make the hope of improvement so easily and hopefully. There is a need of revamping their attitude through all sorts of the commands. In passage of time, they have joined hands and work in gloves with the corrupt politicians resulting into mismanagement of the resources, deteriorated law and order, unsafe borders and wide-spread corruption.

We will have to change ourselves and bring about the transparency in our income resources and expenses not to evade the taxes. The accumulation of unaccounted for money becomes headache and we start to invest that accumulation unethically. In a study, it is revealed that even those people who do not pay income tax have to pay out about 50 to 65% of their income through indirect taxes/service taxes/excise duties  etc. Though the Governments too are required to rationalize the tax structure to enable every citizen to pay tax smoothly, we are also required to ensure that we may declare our income sincerely.  

Further, we are also required to ensure that we would like to take what we deserve and when we deserve. In case we get something undeserving, we would let it go to the deserving fellow citizens.  The government provides subsidy on many products to make them reach by those who are not able to afford. Those who can afford easily must give up subsidy. At least those who are Income tax payers because of their income must give up subsidy on LPG connections they do have. 20 Lakhs Indians have already given up subsidy on LPG. Likewise subsidy on diesel is primarily meant for farmers for their agricultural activities but our rich fellows use the same for their luxury 4-wheelers. We are having reservation in jobs for some classes of society. They are enjoying the same in spite of the fact they have in course of time become well-to-do families but still seek reservation. Such privileges will have to be given up voluntarily in interest of the nation, in interest of those Indians who really deserve. Unless we do not sacrifice the excess with us, we can not expect the other ones to do so.

The Prime Minister has exhorted all the Indians to work like a team and with the Team India of 125 crores Indians, we can make the miracles. Since we made in past and showed to the world, we can repeat the same now also not only for being happy in the rest of our life but leave behind a better India for next generations too. We all need to work hard with all the sincerity at heart for the nation. We need to be happy and for which, we must work hard.

Be Happy – Start Up India, Stand Up India

Sunday, March 29, 2015

Be Happy - We may start making of World as a Happy Family.




Be Happy  - We may start making of World as a Happy Family.

Today I find that there was a post from  Francois Gautier on 26 March at 09:48  mentioning that facebook has deleted his article, “Are Hindus Cowards” His grievances are true because the contents are speaking something true and the truth is found not easily acceptable. FB might be afraid of attacks from those who do not agree with the contents. What he posted on my wall is reproduced herebelow.
He writes - Face Book deleted my article "Are Hindus Cowards"; because of 'inappropriate content'! Do you think that is fair? the ISIS and Al Qaeda use freely Internet, Twitter and FB for their murderous purposes, but when you dare say that there is a problem with Islam, as I have personally witnessed a journalist, in Kashmir, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, you are censored. I am reposting the article below. You judge. FG
ARE HINDUS COWARDS?
Someone wrote today in the face of the growing attacks on Mr Modi at the hands of the Christians, who are creating fake incidents and Mr Narendra Modi’s muted response, that “A dark fear is growing in our minds that we Hindus cannot rule. The art of ruling requires special upbringing, grooming and attitude besides guts and courage.And this raises the question: are Hindus good people, but nevertheless cowards?
“Muslims are bullies and Hindus cowards”, the Mahatma Gandhi once said. He was right – at least about Hindus: there has been in the past 1400 years, since the first invasions started, very few Shivaji Maharaj’s and Rana Pratap’s to fight the bloody rule of the Moghuls, or hardly any Rani of Jhansi’s to stand against the humiliating colonial yoke of the British. If a nation’s soul is measured by the courage of its children, then India is definitely doomed: without the Sikhs, whose bravery is unparalleled in the more recent history of India, Hindus would have even lost additional land to the Muslim invaders and there would have been infinitely more massacres of Hindus by Muslims during the first weeks of Partition. Are Hindus more courageous since they have an independent nation (thanks - not to the non-violence of Gandhi – but to the true nationalists, such as Sri Aurobindo and Tilak, who prepared the ground for the Mahatma at the beginning of the century)? Not at all! Because of Nehru’s absurd and naïve “hindi-chini-bhai-bhai” policy, the Indian army was shamefully routed in 1962 by the Chinese, a humiliation which rankles even today. Beijing is still able to hoodwink Indian politicians, by pretending it has good intentions, through the interviews the Chinese leaders very generously give to the Hindu newspaper (which should rightly be called the “anti-Hindu”) and Frontline (“the mouthpiece in India for the Chinese communist party”), while quietly keeping on giving nuclear know-how to Pakistan, as well as the missiles to carry their atomic warheads to Indian cities, arm separatists groups in the north-east and continuing to claim Arunachal Pradesh or Sikkim. Everywhere in the world, Hindus are hounded, humiliated, routed, be it in Fiji where, an elected democratic government was deposed in an armed coup, or in Pakistan and Bangladesh, where Muslims indulge in pogroms against Hindus every time they want to vent their hunger against India (read Taslima Nasreen’s book “Lalja”). In Kashmir, the land of yogis, where Hindu sadhus and sages have meditated for 5000 years, Hindus have been chased out of their ancestral home by death, terror and intimidation: there were 25% of Hindus at the beginning of the century in the Kashmir valley… and hardly a handful today.
And this is exactly what happened in Bombay, after the Ayodya mosque was brought down by Hindu militants : Muslims, angry of the “terrible” affront done to Islam, started pelting the police with stones and burning shops; but unfortunately for the Muslims, who have made of riots an art (please read the passages of the Koran which deal with riots as part of jihad), they found that for once, the Hindus under the leadership of the Shiv Sena, retaliated blow for blow – an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth – as the Israelis, who have been so long at the receiving end of Muslim bullying, say so well. It is not for us to condone violence: but how long can the Hindus be the butt of killings and persecution, be sacrificial lambs that meekly go to slaughter ? For in a way, Gandhi was right: Muslims are bullies, they have bullied India and they continue to bully Hindu India, as Pakistan demonstrates time and again by shelling in Kashmir, which make the US apply time and again pressure on India to ‘negotiate’ with Pakistan. Remember how Musharraf deceived New Delhi by receiving a well-meaning, but naïve Vajpayee at Lahore, while its soldiers were quietly invading the heights above Kargil.
The truth is that there are two standards in India: one for the Hindus; and one for the Muslims. Did the “fanatic” Hindus who brought down Ayodhya (and brought shame onto secular India, according to the Indian media) kill or even injure anyone in the process? No. But Muslims do not have such qualms. When Gandhi said they were bullies, he was being very nice or very polite. For forget about the millions of Hindus killed during the ten centuries of Muslim invasions, probably the worst Holocaust in world history; forget about the hundreds of thousands of Hindu temples razed to the ground, whose destruction - whatever our “secular” Hindus of today say - was carefully recorded by the Muslims themselves, because they were proud of it (see Aurangzeb’s own chronicles); forget about the millions of Hindus forcibly converted to Islam, and who sadly are now rallying under a banner, a language, a scripture which have nothing to do with their own ethos and culture. Yesterday and also today, when the Muslim world feels it has been slighted, in even a small measure by Hindus, these Infidels, who submitted meekly to Muslim rule for ten centuries, it retaliates a hundred fold – this is the only way one intimidates cowards. After Ayodhya, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia (at least in a passive way by giving shelter for a while to Tiger Memon) with the help of Indian Muslims, planted bombs in the heart of Bombay and killed a thousand innocent human beings, most of them, once more, Hindus. Tomorrow, Pakistan might wage, with the blessing of the Muslim word, the ultimate jihad against India, which if necessary, will utilise the ultimate weapon, nuclear bombs. For has not the Koran said “'Choose not thy friends among the Infidels till they forsake their homes and the way of idolatry. If they return to paganism then take them whenever you find them and kill them” (Koran 98:51-9:5-4:89) ?
Unfortunately for India, the British, when they were here, had created an intellectual elite, to act as a go-between themselves and the “natives”, which today, thanks to the Nehruvian culture of successive Congress governments, looks at its own country, not by means of its own Indian eyes, but through a western prism, as fashioned by the white colonizers and the missionaries. These « Brown Shahibs », these true children of Macaulay, the « secular » politicians, the journalists, the top bureaucrats, in fact the whole westernised cream of India are very critical of anything Hindu. And what is even more paradoxical, is that 98% of them are Hindus ! It is they, who upon getting independence, have denied India its true identity and borrowed blindly from the British education system, without trying to adapt it to the unique Indian mentality and psychology; and it is they who are refusing to accept a change of India’s education system, which is totally western-oriented and is churning out machines, learning by heart boring statistics which are of little usefulness in life. And what India is getting from this education is a youth which apes the West : they go to Mac Donald’s, thrive on MTV culture, wear the latest Klein jeans and Lacoste T Shirts, and in general are useless, rich parasites, in a country which has so many talented youngsters who live in poverty. They will grow-up like millions of other western clones in the developing world, who wear a tie, read the New York Times and swear by liberalism and secularism to save their countries from doom. In time, they will reach elevated positions and write books and articles which make fun of their own country, ridicule the Narendra Modi’s of India and preside human-right committees, be “secular” high bureaucrats who take the wrong decisions and generally do tremendous harm to India, because it has been programmed in their genes to always run down their own country. It is said that a nation has to be proud of itself to move forward - and unless there is a big change in this intellectual elite, unless it is more conscious of its heritage and of India’s greatness, which has begun to happen in a small way, it is going to be very difficult for India to emerge as a real 21st century superpower.
One would be tempted to say in conclusion : “Arise ô Hindus, stop being cowards, remember that a nation requires Kshatriyas, warriors, to defend Knowledge, to protect one’s women and children, to guard one’s borders from the Enemy”…. And do Indians need a Narendra Modi to remind them of that simple truth ? FRANCOIS GAUTIER (*) This is no to say that all Muslims are fanatics; on the contrary, many of India’s Muslims are extremely gentle and their sense of hospitality unsurpassed. The same thing can be said about Pakistan: Pakistani politicians, for instance, are much more accessible than in India and Pakistan has its own identity, which cannot be wished away. No, the problem is not with Muslims, whether they are Indians or Pakistanis, the problem is with Islam, which teaches Indian Muslims from an early age, to look beyond their national identity to a country - the Mecca, in Saudi Arabia - which is not their country, to read a Scripture which is not written in their own language, to espouse a way of thinking, which is inimical to their own roots and indigenous culture. Indian Muslims, have to think of themselves first as Muslims and secondly only as Muslims. Muslim soldiers fighting against Pakistan in Kargil, have shown the way.
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Whatever Francois Gautier wrote, he tried to show mirror to the communities concerned. Rajat Kumar Chakrabarti’s comments on the same page are there. He writes, “ Fantastic FG. Hat's off to you for this superb article. In my 90 years of life , went through 1942 "Bharat Chharo" Andolon, Great Calcutta Killing in 1946, Bombing of calcutta in 1941, famine during the war and last but not the least Partition refugees in Sealdah station, families picking up food from dustbins to feed their children. Had there been a few more men like "Late Balashaeb Thakre " and born earlier Hindus condition would not have been so bad as it stands today with spineless  leaders.
But I would like to add that instead of leading the world in the directions we have so far been following, should we not revisit our own attitude? The Prime Minister of India, Mr.Narendra Modi has repeatedly mentioned that he has been working and would now be continuing to work for the welfare of all the 125 crores Indians. No particular religion/caste will make any special mention in his efforts to modify. And the “Indians” word refers to all those who inhabit in India and except those who follow Hinduism, other inhabitants are either themselves converts to other religions or their forefathers might have changed their religion under some threat or greed but their DNA is still not different. For example, Indian Muslims are fighting bravely against Pakistani Muslims at Kargil or somewhere else. Our Muslim players show their sportsmanship fully not only against their Pakistani counterparts but muslim players from other countries as well. Mr.Jinnah’s stand of Two States for Two Religions at the time of Partition of India has miserably failed in course of time. As far as in free India the policies so far followed are concerned, they have not been found to be very much favouring Hinduism because our politicians so far followed their vote bank policy of dividing the inhabitants into different groups. India may soon adopt uniform policy of development for all of its inhabitants without granting any special privileges to any community or class on any ground.
Now there is some change in India but out of India, we find that much of the politics being followed is afraid of terrorism whether it is being practiced by Muslims or any other. That requires changes. Should we not change our attitude now towards religion by applying our brain power to find out the way to have mental peace for all? Religion as we generally understand is nothing but a set of beliefs based on the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs. In course of time, we found that the religions which have come into existence have somewhat same messages what one religion has but the other has made some modifications. But their interpretations have been changed and the conflicts have arisen. This proves that the code of conducts defined under different religions have utterly failed to bring about peace and happy life on the earth. We should put aside all the codes so far defined in the name of the religions and write down afresh code of conduct for the sake of humanity. It appears that it may not be possible as the so called heads of Religions and the people who trade in arms, may not permit for the fear that their shops may have to be closed down. But we will have to speak out against terrorism whether it is directed against one religion or more. Those who may try to keep silence for any fear would be wiped out soon. Better, we may die fighting against the misrule than to die as cowards. We will have to work even forcefully to achieve the task of making the world as Religion Free World.

Be Happy  - We may start making of World as a Happy Family.